Posts Tagged ‘membership organisation’

Institutions as Mobilising Networks

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

The book I’m reading at the moment is “The Future of Thinking: Learning Institutions in a Digital Age“. The book links to a number of themes I’m interested in, particularly developing knowledge content and user generated content (and also a number of the drivers indentified in the recent NCVO future of membership report).

The book looks at how new technology such as social networks and virtual environments will change how people learn. And although the book is aimed mainly at higher education, there is plenty of read across into the membership organisations as many are knowledge-based and/or educational.

I’ve just finished the chapter titled “Institutions as Mobilising Networks” which contrasts how institutions are often viewed - as rule-driven, centralised, old fashioned and slow moving - with how they could be - trend setting, dynamic, agile and innovative.

The key opportunity (or challenge, depending on how you look at it) is: to use social media and learning environments to aggregate, coordinate and disseminate knowledge and facilitate learning - to mobilise the network of members and other potential participants.

Taking up this challenge could dramatically improve engagement and knowledge development in an institution’s area of interest.

Membership Marketing

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

I’ve been following the (US) membership marketing blog for a few months now and there have been a number of interesting posts for anyone in the membership sector.

Some examples of recent posts that have caught my eye:

  • Membership Renewals: A Couple of Quick Tips
  • 7 Proven Ways to Grow Your Membership
  • Growing concern over membership value
  • What strategy leads to membership growth
  • Book Review: The Best Service is No Service

    Monday, August 23rd, 2010

    The Best Service is No Service” by Bill Price and David Jaffe is an excellent book that ought to be compulsory reading for all companies with a customer service element, mostly because so many of them are so very far from providing even reasonable service.

    The book gives clear, practical advice and loads of examples of where service has gone wrong and of best practice (plenty of examples from Amazon and first direct for instance in this category).

    A few of the most significant points they make are:

  • Good quality self service has major benefits, making it easier for users to do what they want, when they want and significantly reduce operational costs
  • Get rid of unnecessary reasons for people to contact you (”dumb contacts” is the phrase they use in the book) - eliminate contacts that have no value to the customer and no value to the organisation
  • Value those contacts and relationships that are most important to you and have the greatest benefit to the organisation
  • Gather metrics on what people are trying to find out about, both on the website and through calls
  • “Service” is not just the province of a contact / service centre, it is equally important across the whole operation
  • The advice should transform customer experience where it is poor and have a major impact on the bottom line of companies who take notice.

    It is interesting to think about how this impacts on the NFP sector. I think the key issues are:

  • NFP organisations are different from the Amazons and BTs of this world. The relationships with their key stakeholders (particularly members / supporters) are more complex and long term, especially where it forms an important part of their career development or social engagement. This makes the following points even more important.
  • It shows the need for joined-up service, which is likely to be across the whole set of services and interactions - knowing about the member or supporter and their interests across all departments, not just the contact centre and using that information to provide excellent service.
  • Route calls and enquiries to the people who are best suited to provide the best answer.
  • Give ownership of important relationships to the most appropriate department (not necessarily the contact centre).
  • It is particularly important to provide good self service.
  • The two key IT elements of this are:

  • The website needs to have good self service functionality and provide information to eliminate the need for people to phone / email. So, people should be able to update their details, make donations, pay their subscriptions, book events, etc.
  • The CRM needs to be interfaced to the website and be the repository for contact history, preferences, areas of interest and information needed for marketing.
  • Also available: ebook version

    The Future of Membership

    Friday, July 23rd, 2010

    The NCVO has just released the Third Sector Foresight report “What will membership be like in 5 years time?“. The report identifies major drivers that will impact membership organisation over the next 5 years and beyond:

  • changing sources of identity
  • changing attitudes to money and consumerism
  • increasing availability of free information
  • the rise of the social web
  • changing expectations of participation
  • the commodification of membership
  • There are some interesting pointers to how these challenge current models of membership, suggested next steps and a case study.

    It provides a useful starting point for thinking strategically about the impact of the drivers on membership models, engagement … and business and IT changes.

    See also - the blog by Katherine Hudson, one of the authors and member of the NCVO Third Sector Foresight team.

    Cultivating Knowledge through Communities of Practice

    Thursday, June 24th, 2010

    A very interesting slide set - Cultivating knowledge through Communities of Practice - from Steve Dale, the information architect for the award winning local government “Community Hub” online community. He sets out the fundamentals for setting up and encouraging Communities of Practice and the different ways of sharing and developing knowledge.

    The presentation takes is business-focused (rather than IT-focused), looking at the methods and roles to get successful Communities.

    Seminar: The Death and Rebirth of CRM

    Friday, March 26th, 2010

    Our seminar on Wednesday was very well received, with three excellent speakers bringing views and insights on CRM from very different perspectives.

    Abby Wright-Parkes of ACEVO talked about their recent experience of implementing a new database solution - an experience they’ve found very costly. She drew out a number of interesting points for NFPs: that CRM is about relationships, not data; don’t forget about relationships with people who don’t use computers; there is a need for fine tuning of communication preferences; and that it is vital to ensure the culture of the organisation is right for the new strategy and system.

    Chris Jones from Remploy gave his conclusions from their experience of large scale business change, the key theme of which is to build a flexible scalable capability for them as a business. He highlighted two examples of where CRM has been introduced. The first was a technology led programme which has resulted in a system no one uses because the project didn’t engage with the business users to put the system into the context of the business strategy and how the system needed to work operationally. The second was a system (or actually a number of separate systems) that have grown organically in the operational departments. This has resulted in successful individual systems, but which are isolated and with no ability to aggregate the data or the processes.

    Both of these really highlight the need to get the strategy right and to view the programme as a business change programme, rather than an IT project!

    The final speaker was Dominic Monkhouse of Peer1, who brought an entertaining insight into customer service [relationship management] from the commercial world of managed hosting services.  He again emphasised that it is about the culture within the organisation and potentially the need to confront and change that culture. He put forward two challenges around the theme of how can you deliver great service? The first is what can you offer. His examples here were that as UK MD, he gives his mobile number to all clients, and has only ever had four out of hours calls; and that making a very significant offer when things do go wrong has had a huge benefit to customer satisfaction, actually at marginal cost.

    His second challenge was how to drastically reduce the amount of service provided, by giving great service, particularly by eliminating errors (that result in service calls) and providing excellent facilities for customers/users to find the answers they need so easily that they don’t need to call.

    More information: white paper and presentations

    Ready for real-time relationships?

    Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

    I was at an interesting event on Wednesday, hosted by not-for-profit (NFP) supplier Iris, debating the latest technology trends (as relate to the NFP sector).

    The format was to write out your top prediction at the start. These were then all collated and debated, ending up with a vote. I was sat next to Social Media expert Steve Bridger and our contributions had a significant overlap - his was the rise of real-time computing; mine was on the increasing demands for personalisation, of content, and ultimately, of relationship.

    The common ground here is real-time relationships - that in the world of Facebook, LinkedIn and especially Twitter, charity supporters and association members expect a personal conversation that is (near) real time and not constrained to office hours.

    This type of relationship is a real challenge for NFP organisations, certainly for their software, but more importantly organisationally:

  • The best person to contribute to your side of the conversation is unlikely to be in marketing; they are much more likely to be “knowledge workers” in the research or professional development group
  • The working pattern (and HR) implications of the timing of the conversations
  • On the software side, the phrase “social CRM” has been coined in the last year or so and a number of the software vendors such as Oracle are responding. Its important to realise here though that this actually represents a huge mindset change for CRM - from “segment and conquer” to the personal conversation. This is likely to be much more manpower intensive. It is also much more about data assimilation and less about automated marketing.

    We are running a seminar related to this posting in March: Power to Your People: The Death and Rebirth of CRM, hosted by Stephen Bubb, the Chief Executive of AVECO.

    Getting Value from Twitter

    Thursday, August 13th, 2009

    One of the social media tools that is getting a lot of press attention is Twitter, partly because of its use by the likes of Stephen Fry. So the inevitable question for charities and membership organisations is “should we be using Twitter to communicate with our members/supporters?”

    The answer is - it depends … on:

  • What the demographics are of your target audience? Around 10% the online population are Twitter users, but retention rates have not been as good as some other social media sites such as Facebook. Of these, nearly half of Twitter users are young adults, very few children use it and a reasonable number of older adults (20% according to one survey).
  • Take into account how people use Twitter - see for example the recent report on BBC news site. Twitter generally has a low content level, so make sure your content stands out from the crowd.
  • What would you want to communicate to them, or what discussions would you want to have using Twitter? A number of organisations, such as the RSA, have Twitter feeds for informing/reminding people of their events.
  • If the communication is to be two way, this will need to be supported by resources - people expect Twitter to be very responsive and it will probably need an expert level person.
  • The likely conclusion for many NFP organisations, unless there are specific reasons, is to use Twitter in a “push-only” mode for announcements. The take up and effectiveness should be monitored to see how useful a contribution to your online presence it is making.

    If this type of announcement feed is unlikely to be valuable in your situation, wait and review again in a year.